Immaterial Worlds

Technological conceptualism made unusually vibrant at Denver MOCA's Now? Now!

By

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggStumbleUponGoogle+

Exhibition labels – those little placards on the walls beside the thing part of the art – are no longer optional to conscientious looking. In the imagined past, we might have taken in a landscape and breathed, “Isn’t that lovely? Just look at those brushstrokes!” But the priorities of contemporary art have foreclosed on this option. We might even go so far as to define contemporary art as that species of aesthetic work (as opposed to modern, folk, etc.) for which the label is as important as the specimen. Otherwise we risk missing the conceptual forest for the material trees.

Since the 1990s one of the more dominant strains of new work has been a technologically-oriented conceptualism that — if it doesn’t dispose of humanity altogether: the bodily, the gestural, the domestic – finds its importance only in the way those bodies have extended themselves through technology, a technology well-removed from the state of nature, the nuts-and-bolts of existence, anything a patron could begin to brim sentimental over.

Such art is often interested in incorporating materials not typically found in an art gallery, at least not 25 years ago: open source models, industrial units, server platforms, new plastics. At its best, such work lays bare the hidden cables that stitch our new world together, make us suddenly hyper-conscious of the pattern of which we form a part, an invisible part. Exhibition labels are doubly important in such work: without the ideas behind the work, which almost always require spelling-out, we have nothing.

This is doubly true at Now? Now!, the Denver Museum of Contemporary Art’s contribution to the Biennial of the Americas. As the aim behind the enterprise is cultural exchange, we’re hesitant to even approach the stuff on display before we know where its maker is from, anxious to insure that we don’t casually misread another culture’s symbols or its myths.

No work can be Contemporary with a capital C unless it is, at least in part, conceptual, and yet the chances are it’s constructed from tangible materials, and those materials will inevitably have their own story to tell. This tension – roughly, between the actual and the ineffable – keeps all of the work in this latest show unusually vibrant, though some pieces vibrate at higher frequencies than others.

AR_COTTER_DENVER_AP_003
Laleh Mehran and Chris Coleman (b. 1968, Tehran and 1974, Charleston, WV; live and work in Denver, CO) Unclaimed (No reclamado), 2015 Small computer fans, translucent plastic, 3D-printed city model, digital monitors, and electronics (Pequeños ventiladores de computadora, plástico traslúcido, modelo de ciudad impreso en 3D, monitores digitales y piezas electrónicas) Courtesy the artists. This artwork was made possible in part by a grant from the University of Denver.

Stepping into the room on the second floor solely devoted to Chris Coleman and Laleh Mehran’s Unclaimed, you encounter a scale model of a city on a waist-high plinth. Gradually, you become aware of a crinkling sound above you: a ceiling made of plastic, rippling when you breathe. This is due to the tiny fans hooked up below the ceiling, pointing up. They’re rigged to trigger a ripple when you speak or direct any air across the model city. These movements also light that city from beneath.

As the placard explains, the model city in Unclaimed is intended to direct the viewer’s attention to the air above it, the layer of troposphere (incorrectly identified on the label as “the stratosphere,” a higher elevation than the one in question) between the roofs of the buildings and the air space controlled by federal aviation. This, we’re told, is the last morsel of uncontrolled real estate in the United States, the last unclaimed space.

Like most objects generated from a 3-D printer, the scale model has a translucent, prenatal quality. It’s deliberately no-place: a row of toy houses, a couple of big-box stores, skyscrapers, and a basilica at its center. There are no trees, no dogs or people. Though the artists may or may not have intended this, their model evokes a world in which all life, except the viewer’s own godly breath, is absent or extinguished, leaving only an empty city.

It is smart, engagé, and forbiddingly austere. There is a death-like whiteness to the rubbery city, and an eeriness to the crinkle above, not entirely mitigated by the extra-terrestrial lights. One ingests the idea – that unclaimed space is a commons, aswirl with molecules we’ll all be breathing – but one does not linger over it. It would be like lingering inside an empty morgue.

Like Unclaimed, Sterling Crispin’s N.A.N.O family of sculptures reads as much like a science project as it does an object of art: four five-foot server racks frame little stock trading screens. The screens occupy the upper half of the racks, and emergency survival material (water, a nanofilter, dried food) comprise the lower half. Nanotech (where N.A.N.O gets its name) is one of the four respective industries each machine represents an investment in (an actual clutch of shares); the others are B.I.O., I.N.F.O., and C.O.G.N.O. – the four new gods of the future. All of these bits and pieces are secured to the tall racks with zip ties. In a nod to Shinto shrines, all four servers are framed with black Plexiglas edgings, like three-dimensional Rorschach blotches. It personalizes them a little, giving them more human dimensions, like toy Japanese robots from the 1980s.

Crispin’s server assemblages touch nicely on the familiar places our fear and our cynicism lie. They also compose a challenge: Our whole society is built on silicon, they seem to say, so you can be cynical about that all you like, but should it fail, should it collapse, you’ll need this water and this food. There are a lot of ideas in the pieces. It is art that has checked every box, even gesturing toward the aesthetic. Contempt and trepidation are emotions it seeks to provoke, but because it works so unsubtly to do so, and so self-consciously, I wasn’t lured into them. I felt instead a cool admiration for the artist’s ambition.

Warmer – perhaps because it touches more immediately on the purely human – is the Brazilian artist Marcello Cicade’s Geometry of Collapse. Don’t let the pretentious name fool you: this is the real thing, a piece you might walk straight past with a roll of your eyes in one sort of mood, but one that, in another sort of mood, absorbs as much of your time as you’re willing to give it, or that you can’t help but give it.

AR_COTTER_DENVER_AP_004
Marcelo Cidade (b. 1979, São Paulo; lives and works in São Paulo) Geometry of Collapse (Geometría del colapso), 2015 Recycled-industrial-fiber blankets, metal wire (Mantas de fibras industriales recicladas, alambre metálico). Courtesy the artist and Galeria Vermelho, São Paulo

Five gray blankets hang suspended from a wire high on the wall, roughly gathered into two folded squares, corners turned back like hotel linen. There’s tension here between the desire of the viewer’s mind to call the shape a square, and the blankets’ uneven hems. There’s also tension between the setting, a reasonably prestigious museum filled with reasonably well-dressed patrons, and the blankets themselves: they are recycled industrial-fiber blankets of the kind that cities like Denver and Sāo Paulo distribute free to the homeless. This is stunt tension, of course, but it works.

These are new blankets and they smell new, a world away from how they would smell in use. They couldn’t be more conspicuous here, even in a crowded room, but they work as a sort of camouflage on the streets, hiding their uniform users, blending them together, concealing them.

They move a little in the air, brushing lightly back and forth against the wall. This calls to mind the movement of a body inside them. And it does so in a way that makes itself indispensable as an object. I enjoyed thinking about Unclaimed and N.A.N.O., but I don’t feel the need to look at them again. I get the ideas. Geometry of Collapse isn’t like that.

Up close, metallic fibers glisten; small leaves are caught in the weave and press; pinkish gray fibers at a distance differentiate into every possible color up close: dirty peach, turquoise, infected mauve. You could look and find new things for hours. As a consequence, Cicade’s blankets are not merely a political statement, they are a readymade Jackson Pollock. They do not, like Jeff Koons’ Hoovers in vitrines, blandly lob a spitball at the middle class, winking all the while. They indict everyone in the gallery space at the same time that they captivate as objects. •

Lead image: Sterling Crispin (b. 1985, Maui, HI; lives and works in Topanga, CA), N.A.N.O., B.I.O., I.N.F.O. and C.O.N.G.O., 2015. Aluminum server rack, Ethernet cables, zipties, LCD screen, survival equipment, water, dehydrated food, and mixed media. Courtesy the artist and Evan Semón.

John Cotter’s first novel Under the Small Lights appeared in 2010 from Miami University Press. A founding editor at the review site Open Letters Monthly, John’s published critical work in Sculpture, Bookforum, and The The Poetry Foundation. Say hi at John [at] JohnCotter [dot] net.
EmailTwitterFacebookDiggStumbleUponGoogle+

More to read...

  • Measuring GeniusMeasuring Genius The praise for the recent Museum of Modern Art exhibition, boldly but simply entitled Picasso Sculpture, contained one superlative after another. Roberta Smith, writing in the New York […]
  • How To Remain HumanHow To Remain Human A young poet killed himself in Cleveland on November 24, 1968. He did it with a .22 caliber rifle he’d owned since childhood. In the years leading up to his death, the poet often […]
  • A Portrait of the Artist as a Young WomanA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Woman ...might be hard to find, even in the 21st century. At art auctions in 2014 and 2015, 92% of lots were by male artists. But at least women don’t need permission to paint fish — anymore. […]

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.