Pretty Nice

Meditating on the word "pretty"

By

Making the cute pretty
EmailTwitterFacebookDiggStumbleUponGoogle+

I love the word pretty.

A theory: “Pretty” has gone out of favor because we are greedy, and want the merely pretty to be fully beautiful, and so we go around calling things beautiful that are pretty.

There’s something self-flattering about it — describing a thing as beautiful makes the speaker appear more sensitive to beauty. Conversely, “pretty” always sounds like an understatement, and as such can actually be more flattering to the thing described.

I love especially when men, or straight men, say the word pretty. Women, or straight women, are trained to recognize prettiness, or admit freely when they do. So there’s something endearing about a man calling an object — a bit of music, a tennis shot — pretty; it’s a moment of vulnerability. I also love a straight man in a pink shirt.

I noticed the word “pretty” used twice recently, in art, to describe “the other woman.” In the film Blue Jasmine, Cate Blanchett’s character describes the yoga instructor her husband is — unbeknownst to her — fucking as pretty: “Isn’t she pretty?” After her sister tips her off that something is going on, she says it again, this time suspiciously, to her husband: “She’s so pretty.” (Blanchett herself would rarely be described as pretty; there’s too much seriousness to her beauty.)

In the novella Walks with Men by Ann Beattie, Jane is surprised on her front steps one morning by a woman who turns out to be the wife of her (20 years older) boyfriend. The wife, Lisa, says, “You’re pretty. I wouldn’t have expected otherwise. I’m pretty too.” And then again, just before she leaves, more disdainfully: “Oh you really are pretty.” Lisa, who is older than Jane but younger than her husband, admits she had hoped they would be friends: “But there’s no spark between us. Am I wrong?” Jane concedes: “I don’t really feel drawn to you.”

In both scenes, pretty turns quickly to an accusation. Beautiful suggests depth, even profundity. But not pretty — prettiness entails lightness; it’s fleeting, flimsy. Calling someone pretty — or worse, cute — can be diminishing.

Sianne Ngai, the author of Our Aesthetic Categories, has said that “cuteness is a way of aestheticizing powerlessness”:

It hinges on a sentimental attitude toward the diminutive and/or weak, which is why cute objects — formally simple or noncomplex, and deeply associated with the infantile, the feminine, and the unthreatening — get even cuter when perceived as injured or disabled.

This is why we want to do violence to cuteness — or, rather, why we feel protective of cuteness, a countermeasure to the instinct toward violence. I think often of this shocking image I saw on essayist Alice Bolin’s Tumblr, a kitten wearing blush:

BW_GABBERT_PRETTY_AP_001

To attempt to make a kitten, the epitome of cuteness, cuter: It’s madness!

I have been contemplating Debbie Harry’s face, its planar impact. It is not really cute or pretty or even beautiful, but sublime — it feels like a cultural accomplishment, like the Sphinx. We should project it into space. It should be on the Sphinx.

BW_GABBERT_PRETTY_AP_002

Sublimity requires awe — almost fear, doesn’t it? I flipped through my copy of Terry Eagleton’s Ideology of the Aesthetic from grad school; I had not recalled that it paints Edmund-Burkeian sublimity as practically a loathsome side effect of testosterone (boldface mine):

The very conditions which guarantee social order also paralyse it: sunk in this narcissistic closure, men of affairs grow effete and enervated, sympathy becomes cloying and incestuous, and beauty sinks to a byword of stagnation. Some countervailing energy is therefore necessary, which Burke discovers in the virile strenuousness of the sublime […] The sublime is on the side of enterprise, rivalry and individuation: it is a phallic ‘swelling’ arising from our confrontation of danger, although a danger we encounter figuratively, vicariously, in the pleasurable knowledge that we cannot actually be harmed. In this sense, the sublime is a suitably defused, aestheticized version of the values of the ancien regime.

This is why it’s so easy to aestheticize war from a distance: frisson of danger, no real danger. Like pretty becomes something that can be crushed, sublime becomes something that crushes. Kant called it Das Unform: “the formless or monstrous.” I tried to watch Apocalypse Now and was horrified: impossible, maybe, to critique war in film without also glorifying it. The horrors of war are what make war necessary; critique as propaganda. (I say I was horrified; I was also bored.)

Supposedly, the mere exposure effect explains why we prefer a mirror image to a photograph — familiarity alone breeds appreciation. And yet: The familiar is pretty, the unfamiliar beautiful. (But if beauty is rare, it would have to be unfamiliar; aesthetics can be circular.) Killingly this effect would seem to explain away much of aesthetics, and perhaps why we find our long-term partners “more beautiful now than ever” — we look at them all the time — and yet prefer our younger selves. A few glances in the mirror each day can’t compete with all our memories of past images, becoming idealized and multiplying each time we access them, almost infinitely. •

Photos via Tumblr and by andrew_lf via Flickr (Creative Commons)

Elisa Gabbert is the author of L’Heure Bleue, or the Judy Poems (Black Ocean), The Self Unstable (Black Ocean) and The French Exit (Birds LLC). Follow her on Twitter at @egabbert.
EmailTwitterFacebookDiggStumbleUponGoogle+

More to read...

  • All Work and No PlayboyAll Work and No Playboy Playboy announced yesterday that it will be covering up a bit after over 60 years of publication. In response the surge of nude and pornographic content available for free online, the […]
  • Face ValueFace Value Every few months there’s another finger-wagging piece about models in the fashion industry. Generally, the topic is weight: the epidemic of anorexia; the efforts underway to mandate a […]
  • The Point of TangencyThe Point of Tangency When writing a poem, I often have the impression that I’m working with a finite amount of material, like a block of stone from which I need to carve out a sculpture. It’s exacting, […]
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

I think of pretty as something that has an element of sweetness to it. Big eyes, plump lips, symmetry. Amy Adams is pretty. Hallie Berry and Taylor Swift are pretty. As for pretty men, James Wilby is the prettiest evah!! Also Mel Gibson when young, Sal Mineo, Elvis Presley, and for modern times, Tom Hardy.

Well I reckon that pretty much sums it up! I do wonder though if the male equivanlent of the Beattie scene would be “Oh, your phallus is so pretty!”

I dunno – I think Cate Blanchett is “pretty”, no matter how serious her beauty is (whatever that means).

wpDiscuz